Comment on Background: Data integration methodologies for systems biology (Thesis 1.6) by Chapter 2: SyMBA (Thesis) « the mind wobbles - http://themindwobbles.wordpress.com/2012...
Comment on Background: Data integration methodologies for systems biology (Thesis 1.6) by Chapter 6: General Discussion (Thesis) « the mind wobbles - http://themindwobbles.wordpress.com/2012...
[...] and fewer mapping errors during the integration process. But as has been described in Section 1.6, many syntactic data integration methods remain popular and are being successfully developed [...]
- Allyson Lister
Comment on Background: Standards as a shared structure for data (Thesis: 1.4) by Chapter 6: General Discussion (Thesis) « the mind wobbles - http://themindwobbles.wordpress.com/2012...
[...] once ’just-enough’ data description strategies are no longer enough (as described in Section 1.4), as the amount of metadata asked of researchers grows, the chance of receiving complete metadata [...]
- Allyson Lister
[...] difficult, partly due to the bespoke nature of the majority of available tools [5]. MFO (Chapter 4) transforms existing SBML specification documents into a single model in OWL, allowing the storage [...]
- Allyson Lister
[...] making maintenance and structuring of that data of primary importance [1, 2]. SyMBA (Chapter 2) aids the formalisation of systems biology knowledge by providing a common structure for [...]
- Allyson Lister
[Previous: Chapter 5: Rule-based mediation] [Latex to WordPress Conversion Notes] General Discussion As the structure, description and interconnectedness of life science data has become more sophisticated, a shared formalisation of all data for systems biology has become easier to imagine. Tools are available, such as those used by the Semantic Web community, to capture any [...]
- Allyson Lister