John (bird whisperer)

:D - Jennifer Dittrich

:-D - John (bird whisperer)

They raved too hard. - Marie

My aunt and uncle are both nurses. At one point, they worked in the same dept. My aunt has 7+ years exp. She started in that dept. in 1993. He came on in 1997 and made $8K more than she did. After he got his Master's degree the next year, it went up even higher. Even though she was 2nd in seniority with more education than him, he still outearned her. Their running joke was, "Imagine what we'd make if we were white!". - Anika

Annual State of Black America report shows troubling disparities persist http://www.washingtonpost.com/local... - chaz2b

Lovely pic! - AHnix (Anna Haro)

They're very pretty up close. :) - Jenny H.

"Floof" must be one of those ornithologically technical terms - WoH: Professor MOTHRA

Yes, very technical. - John (bird whisperer)

:((( - Jenny H.

I should visit that place some spring. - John (bird whisperer)

*adds to my list of places to visit* - holly #ravingfangirl

It sounds like it would be pretty amazing, especially once the petals start falling. - Jennifer Dittrich

It's pretty nice. Parking can be a bit of a pain though so the two years we went we arrived after 3pm when people are starting to leave. - rønin

:D - Jennifer Dittrich

:-D - John (bird whisperer)

"Another aspect of philosophy of science bears scrutiny, an aspect McCormack and Maley (2015) touched upon but did not explore fully: Subspecies have no place in the schema of the phylogenetic species concept, so adherents to that concept are predisposed to a finding of “no subspecies” because below the generic level a taxon is either a species or it is nothing. A basic tenet of the hypothetico-deductive framework, the bedrock of scientific inquiry, is that valid alternatives are tested, yet Zink et al. (2013) tested implicitly only 2 alternatives, both of which would have yielded the same conclusion. Had they concluded that distinct genetic clusters were present, they would have declared the gnatcatcher taxa to be species and trumpeted this example of cryptic species others had overlooked. Had they concluded (as they did with their visual inspection of haplotype networks but with no statistical tests) that no geographic pattern was present, they would have declared no taxa to be discernible (which they did). Their ideology left them no other options. In other words, if a conclusion of species = A, subspecies = B, and no taxa = C, then under the framework adopted, only A or C could be reached; there is no suitable alternative, in the hypothetico-deductive sense, under which conclusion B could have been reached. This situation is acceptable if researchers do not intend to draw an inference about subspecies limits, but it is patently unacceptable if they do." - John (bird whisperer)

"In the interim, I suggest a simple solution to resolve the problem: Add alterative B to the framework of the phylogenetic species concept. In principle, this addition is simple. Because a subspecies is defined by its morphological diagnosability (Patten and Unitt 2002), a researcher needs to account for phenotype as well as genotype, and genetic differences alone are not enough to define a subspecies (Mousseau and Sikes 2011). Under the biological species concept, a diagnosably distinct, geographically circumscribed segment not reproductively isolated from other such segments would be deemed a subspecies and not a species. I propose that under the phylogenetic species concept, a (morphologically) diagnosably distinct, geographically circumscribed clade that does not form a distinct (neutral) genetic cluster or is not reciprocally monophyletic (I mention this because its assessment is common practice, not because it is a criterion inherent to the concept) in relation to other such clades be deemed a subspecies and not a species. Only a failure to achieve both phenotypic and genotypic distinctiveness—by which I mean a large effect size (Patten 2010, Tobias et al. 2010)—ought to lead a researcher to conclude that a subspecies is taxonomically invalid." - John (bird whisperer)

The first deadhead. - Greg GuitarBuster

What is the porpoise. - John (bird whisperer)

A porpoiseful pun? - Jennifer Dittrich