Mr. Gunn

Euan Adie et al. Published using Mendeley: The research tool for desktop & web - Mr. Gunn

Spine (2014). Volume: 39, Issue: 20. Pages: 1633-9. Natalie Sidorkewicz, Stuart M McGill et al. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated measures design. OBJECTIVE: To describe male spine movement and posture characteristics during coitus and compare these characteristics across 5 common coital positions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Exacerbation of pain during coitus due to coital movements and positions is a prevalent issue reported by low back pain patients. A biomechanical analysis of spine movements and postures during coitus has never been conducted. METHODS: Ten healthy males and females engaged in coitus in the following preselected positions and variations: QUADRUPED, MISSIONARY, and SIDELYING. An optoelectronic motion capture system was used to measure 3-dimensional lumbar spine angles that were normalized to upright standing. To determine whether each coital position had distinct spine kinematic profiles, separate univariate general linear models, followed by Tukey's honestly significant... - Mr. Gunn

"But Easternblot's point is that print media isn't inherently more stable or secure. How much research was destroyed in the riots in the Arab Spring and subsequent fighting in Iraq and elsewhere? The CLOCKSS system that EB refers too was developed over many years by a consortium of librarians and publishers, exactly the sort of people to whom we have always entrusted the job of preservation of research. These people know what they're doing." - Mr. Gunn

"There's http://experiment.com and others like that propose exactly this, but some people are already using [Indiegogo](https://www.indiegogo.com/project...), [Kickstarter](https://www.kickstarter.com/project...), and [RocketHub](http://www.rockethub.com/project...) for this." - Mr. Gunn

"article-level metrics or altmetrics: ImpactStory, http://alm.plos.org/ altmetric.com preprint: [SSRN](http://www.ssrn.com/) megajournals: [PLOS ONE](http;//plosone.org) independent peer review: [Pubmed Commons](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedc...) and also PubPeer, Publons, Peerage of Science (there's dozens)" - Mr. Gunn

"All very good points, but when you take these concerns to funders and publishers, as I have, they say that what they do is driven by what researchers want. You see the same dynamic in the popular press. People complain about clickbait, but respected newspapers are getting more and more into clickbait from watching the success of things like Buzzfeed and Upworthy. So we have to bring about change from within. As long as the belief that you have to publish in C/N/S to get grants exists, people will still compete to publish in C/N/S. You, I, and everyone else who reviews papers or grants has to stand up against this and bring change from within." - Mr. Gunn

"I can't speak for all of Elsevier, but the Mendeley team quite likes F1000Research and I know many within Elsevier who also appreciate the approach. Elsevier has yet to launch their own "megajournal"-style journal like PLOS ONE, but they have experimented with open peer review and you never know what the future may hold... ;-)" - Mr. Gunn

"With F1000Research and others such as PLOS ONE, the money comes from the authors & this also allows the journal to retain editorial staff." - Mr. Gunn

"See http://osf.io/ for the leading example of a group trying what you're talking about." - Mr. Gunn

"As Rebecca mentioned above, many have tried to build open peer review platforms and one thing we know is that putting articles up and hoping they'll be found by the right person just doesn't work. There are too many articles & too people who have something worthwhile to say about any one given article. Additionally, the people who have the most to say have the least time and inclination to do so, particularly on a site which is new to them. That's why I think Pubmed Commons has the best chance among non-journal platforms." - Mr. Gunn

"In fact, no one does review for the journals with problems, but that doesn't stop these outfits from listing many prestigious academics as reviewers without their knowledge or permission." - Mr. Gunn

"This is true, and many people have begun to work on bringing the discovery mechanisms common on the internet to the scholarly realm. See altmetrics.org, impactStory, altmetric.com, Plum Analytics, etc." - Mr. Gunn

"The identities of reviewers are anonymous, but the editorial boards of journals are advertised on the journal sites." - Mr. Gunn

"The best examples in this space (PLOS ONE, eLife, PeerJ, Scientific Reports, and F1000Research) keep a strict firewall between editorial and financial. No one involved in the acceptance decision knows if the manuscript has paid full fare or qualified under a fee waiver scheme. They also use academic editors and reviewers, who are external to the journal, to give reviews and make recommendations, which insulates them from some bias." - Mr. Gunn

Stacy Konkiel, Heather Piwowar, Jason Priem et al. Published using Mendeley: The reference software for researchers - Mr. Gunn

Stefanie Haustein, Timothy D. Bowman, Kim Holmberg, Andrew Tsou, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, Vincent Larivière et al. Published using Mendeley: The bibliography manager for researchers - Mr. Gunn

Ernesto Priego et al. Published using Mendeley: The research tool for desktop & web - Mr. Gunn

Pages: 1-11. Anurag Acharya, Alex Verstak, Helder Suzuki, Sean Henderson, Mikhail Iakhiaev, Cliff Chiung Yu Lin, Namit Shetty et al. Published using Mendeley: The reference manager for researchers - Mr. Gunn

Peter Kraker, Christian Schlögl, Kris Jack, Stefanie Lindstaedt et al. Published using Mendeley: Academic software for researchers - Mr. Gunn

IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (2014). Hamed Alhoori, Richard Furuta et al. Published using Mendeley: The library management tool for researchers - Mr. Gunn

Princeton University Press (2011). Pages: 280. Michael Nielsen et al. Published using Mendeley: The reference manager for researchers - Mr. Gunn

Biochemical pharmacology (2014). Limei Wang, Birgit Waltenberger, Eva-Maria Pferschy-Wenzig, Martina Blunder, Xin Liu, Clemens Malainer, Tina Blazevic, Stefan Schwaiger, Judith M Rollinger, Elke H Heiss, Daniela Schuster, Brigitte Kopp, Rudolf Bauer, Hermann Stuppner, Verena M Dirsch, Atanas G Atanasov et al. Agonists of the nuclear receptor PPARγ are therapeutically used to combat hyperglycaemia associated with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. In spite of being effective in normalization of blood glucose levels, the currently used PPARγ agonists from the thiazolidinedione type have serious side effects, making the discovery of novel ligands highly relevant. Natural products have proven historically to be a promising pool of structures for drug discovery, and a significant research effort has recently been undertaken to explore the PPARγ-activating potential of a wide range of natural products originating from traditionally used medicinal plants or dietary sources. The... - Mr. Gunn

Biochemical pharmacology (2014). Limei Wang, Birgit Waltenberger, Eva-Maria Pferschy-Wenzig, Martina Blunder, Xin Liu, Clemens Malainer, Tina Blazevic, Stefan Schwaiger, Judith M Rollinger, Elke H Heiss, Daniela Schuster, Brigitte Kopp, Rudolf Bauer, Hermann Stuppner, Verena M Dirsch, Atanas G Atanasov et al. Agonists of the nuclear receptor PPARγ are therapeutically used to combat hyperglycaemia associated with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. In spite of being effective in normalization of blood glucose levels, the currently used PPARγ agonists from the thiazolidinedione type have serious side effects, making the discovery of novel ligands highly relevant. Natural products have proven historically to be a promising pool of structures for drug discovery, and a significant research effort has recently been undertaken to explore the PPARγ-activating potential of a wide range of natural products originating from traditionally used medicinal plants or dietary sources. The... - Mr. Gunn