Both figures in my 4-page white paper for DTRA proposal cited @figshare uploads. I also highlighted open notebook science, open data, and open access. Just finished the proposal with 75 minutes to spare :)
Bill Hooker,
Claudia Koltzenburg,
Cameron Neylon,
Mickey Schafer,
Kubke,
science3point0,
and
Heather Piwowar
liked this
Brilliant Steve - Wishing you the best of luck with it!
- science3point0
Thanks, Mark! Like all of them it's a long shot (and only a white paper/1st round at that). But it's sort of fun to tout open science in the proposal, and the work you and others did with FigShare made it much easier and much more "legit," I think. Thanks!
- Steve Koch
BTW, Here are the two figures I link to: http://figshare.com/figures... ... and ... http://figshare.com/figures... The first is hot off the press 2011 and the second is "unpublished" (until FigShare recently) from 2003. I am still mulling over whether I can/should publish the proposal on Scribd. There is one good reason not too: I don't yet have permission from people named in the proposal. The bad reason is that it's a pretty sloppy / rushed proposal.
- Steve Koch
to DTRA? like the dod dtra? interested to see what they think of the openness
- Christina Pikas
Yes Defense Threat Reduction Agency. I submitted a white paper couple years ago with open science that was rejected, but without feedback. I am currently funded by a DTRA basic research grant and we are conducting the project completely openly with knowledge of the project manager. I don't get a lot of feedback, but if anything, he is enthusiastic about the openness. DTRA basic research program truly seems to promote basic and open research, as far as I can tell.
- Steve Koch