When people post about the date containing numerical sequences or other oddities, I always want to point out that "14" is really "2014" which spoils it. In related news, I am a horrible pedant. #saturdayff
Dec 13, 2014
from
Steven Perez,
Louis Gray,
Anne Bouey,
John (bird whisperer),
Daniel W. Crompton,
Big Joe Silenced,
Brian Johns,
Zulema ❧ spicy cocoa tart,
Mark H,
Jenny H.,
Son of Groucho,
Hookuh Tinypants,
COMPLICATED MR. NOODLE,
Moniqua,
Starmama,
Brent Schaus,
LB ❤s FF,
Tamara J. B.,
chaz2b,
imabonehead,
Meg VMeg,
and
Sir Shuping is just sir
liked this
The excitement over these "sequences" is lost on me.
- Stephan Planken
Stephan, I think it's related to an attraction to round numbers and seeing faces in clouds. We are natural-born pattern detectors.
- Stephen Mack
Kevin's take also discounts the value of other types of sequences: 05/10/15, for example.
- Bren
And 01/01/17 is the next sequential prime day.
- Louis Gray
ISO standard is 2014-12-13
- Glen Campbell
rt @trove: A baby was born on 10:11, 12-13-14 in Massachusetts: trov.es/1AzlGn2
- chaz2b
Considering we don't really know when Jesus was born, it maybe really should be the year 2018 instead of 2014. I wish God would have had a digital camera with the date and time on it so that he could better document the birth of his son.
- Joe